Saturday, December 13, 2008

Beat up the rich at your own peril

Beat up the rich at your own peril!!!

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men — the poorest — would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1, the sixth would pay $3, the seventh $7, the eighth $12, the ninth $18, and the tenth man — the richest — would pay $59.

That's what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement — until one day, the owner threw them a curve (in tax language a tax cut).

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." So now dinner for the ten only cost $80.00.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. Therefore, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"

The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being PAID to eat their meal. So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

So, the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59. Each of the six was better off than before. Moreover, the first four continued to eat for free.

However, once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man who pointed to the tenth. "But he got $7!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man, "I only saved a dollar, too! It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man, "why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. Nevertheless, when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered, a little late what was very important. They were FIFTY-TWO DOLLARS short of paying the bill!

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Greed kills, and the UAW should die!

In this case I hope the UAW stands its ground, forcing the automakers into bankruptcy. Then, perhaps all contracts with the UAW can be declared null and void, putting an end to the UAW.

Can you imagine where the electronics and technology sector would be today if they had to deal with the likes of the UAW? Instead of cell phones, we would still be using phone booths at a charge of $3/minute! Instead of what we have in personal computers, the regional data centers would be thriving! Unions, IMO, outlived their usefulness years ago. The majority of them are greedy, causing more harm than good.

Tonight, the Senate rightfully rejected the $14B bailout for the automakers because the UAW refused to accept pay cuts until the end of their current contract, in 2011. I'm sure they hope that by then, everything will be much better and no pay cuts will be necessary. What's wrong with the UAW accepting salary and benefits equal to employees of other automakers in the USA? See this article for a list and description of other, better autos that are built in the USA. Autoworkers, save your jobs! Tell the UAW to back off and not be so greedy!

Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going to be a pleasant sight."

Too bad! I also have money and retirement funds tied up in stocks. But, it's time we get our fiscal house in order and stop printing money that is backed by nothing more than more debt!

"Congressional Republicans were already in open revolt against Bush over an auto bailout deal the White House negotiated with congressional Democrats, passed by the House on Wednesday."

George W. Bush - A RINO if I've ever seen one! I don't know why the liberal democrats are so against Bush, as he's proven himself more of a liberal than a conservative in more ways than one. A true conservative wouldn't back the things GWB has, including amnesty for illegal aliens. If liberals don't like GWB, just wait until they get a taste of BHO!

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Bamboozled, again!

Now that we have all seen how the Treasury and Wall Street pulled the wool over Congress' eyes, a few of our Representatives are starting to see how foolish they were to trust the likes of Hank Paulson, Nancy Pelosi, et al.

Rather than using the bailout money to buy up bad assets and mortgages from banks, the Treasury bought into those banks and bailed out their friends on Wall Street. Main Street has had little to no benefit from the first half of the original $700,000,000,000 . Hopefully, Congress is starting to wise up and will require better expenditure of the second half, if allowed at all. But, I doubt it. Throw a little pork at these people and they'll fall all over themselves to give up whatever is required in return, regardless of what's right for the American people. AIG, banks and Wall Street, auto manufacturers - sure, let's give all of them money that we don't have.

"We gave them money for one thing and then they used it for another," said Rep. David Scott, a member of the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee.

"They said we'd have more oversight; no oversight is in place. These are lies. We've been bamboozled. The Treasury secretary owes us an explanation," said the Georgia Democrat.

"Please don't come here and ask for another penny because if you do, I'm going to work 24 hours a day with the same people I worked with to support you to make sure that they do not support giving you another dime," said Rep. Maxine Waters of California.

Poor ol' Neel Kashkari, Hank Paulson's lightening rod and whipping boy , continues to try defending the actions of his boss. Rather than Paulson getting out there in front of Congress to get grilled, he sends out poor ol' Neel. Do you suppose he really gets paid enough to be treated like that or does he just enjoy the attention, no matter the price?

Meanwhile, they are still advocating the same old things that got us into this fix in the first place, more credit and bigger mortgages, rather than paying off debt and saving. "Reducing interest rates to get borrowers off the sidelines so they can afford to buy a home for the first time or afford a bigger home is the only thing that's going to help home prices, so we think it has some merit," Kashkari said. Sad. Some fools never learn.
Good old Wall Street Boys!
BTW, Hank Paulson was formerly the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs and Neel Kashkari was a former Vice President at Goldman, Sachs.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Dippin' Obama?

Barack Obama pledges not to smoke in White House

Updated Monday, December 8th 2008, 2:34 A


Nah! That's not a pinch between the cheek and gum, is it? (Just kidding, folks!)


Dying will soon cost more in Oregon

Oregonians will pay more to hunt, fish, camp, drive, get a fancy license plate and, yes, even die under a host of fee increases proposed by Gov. Ted Kulongoski in his 2009-11 budget.

These Liberal Democrats have never seen a tax or fee increase they didn't like! Even during this time of massive unemployment and financial crisis, Governor Kulongoski (D) pours salt into the wounds, rather than coming up with a plan to bring a measure of relief to Oregonians. These increases would have made more sense during the time of prosperity, not now!

Full story -
Kulongoski proposes big jump in most Oregon fees
by Harry Esteve, The Oregonian
Sunday December 07, 2008, 9:30 PM

All I can say is that the next time you think our elected officials and the CEOs of some of the largest, most prestigious corporations in America must be more intelligent than the average Joe Sixpack, remember this time and how they have performed!

Friday, December 5, 2008

Answer me this, if you can

Why is it that the bailout for Wall Street was pushed through without so much as a hearing from the CEOs involved, but the CEOs from GM, Ford, and Chrysler are being grilled and humiliated? I find myself actually being embarrassed for them! I just don't get it. Well, maybe I do, but I would be interested in your take on it. I do know enough to follow the money for answers but I guess I'm just missing where the money trail broke down between the auto industry and those in charge of the Federal purse strings.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Why is the media silent...

Why is the media silent on the Obama birth certificate question?

Why has every major news source in the United States almost totally blacked out all reference to the Hawaiian Obama birth certificate controversy?

The media recently reported Barack Obama's choice of a corned beef sandwich for his lunch. The question about his Blackberry phone has gotten more media attention than the birth certificate question.

...if the question is not answered until after the inauguration every executive order or law Barack Obama has enacted will be nullified.

It is the Constitution that asks the question to President Elect Barack Obama; are you a natural born citizen of these United States?

For some possible answers and additional information, please read the full story at:

December 1, 2008
By Michael Bresciani